We want our abs back!!CAMPAIGN Mech´s and players

[Mekan 0]

"Something must be done"

Need fiz mech abs in pvp!

 

In EPT,Bpt and others, mech can tank 4~6 players at the same time depending of lvl chars(3-4lvl diferençe) (using many pots ofcourse,but rarely die against 4~6)

Guys, i know here isnt EPT or BPT but did you understand?...The ORIGIN of Class Mechanician is tank!And a razoable power

like kill in critical or in insistence of figth,with  a razoable power GS(i think 79% is not much)

I have hope something ll be done,some GM look this topic,because i hear a lot of friendly mechs in game complaining of mech abs.

Thanks 

[babyarcher 0]

Nah, GS crit is fine. It needs a little more ATR IMO, cuz mechs miss way too much now. But as for tanking, if you want to tank in pvp, you need to sacrifice killing powerr, u should not have best of both worlds.

 

But yes, mech abs needs to be fixed.

[Zero 0]

There is already a topic about this, post over there. Don't just create another thread of the same topic already on the 1st page, it is pointless.

[Mekan 0]

There is already a topic about this, post over there. Don't just create another thread of the same topic already on the 1st page, it is pointless.

Yes i know still have a topic ,but i created a new with the same subject, cause i think that can increase our request to fix the abs problem,I believe that a mass request can be more useful.

[meeks 0]

There is already a topic about this, post over there. Don't just create another thread of the same topic already on the 1st page, it is pointless.

Yes i know still have a topic ,but i created a new with the same subject, cause i think that can increase our request to fix the abs problem,I believe that a mass request can be more useful.

 

check my topic in bug report section: http://www.realmpt.com/forum/index.php?topic=40140.0

 

i keep this topic up on first page of that section...

[Mekan 0]

Nah, GS crit is fine. It needs a little more ATR IMO, cuz mechs miss way too much now. But as for tanking, if you want to tank in pvp, you need to sacrifice killing powerr, u should not have best of both worlds.

 

But yes, mech abs needs to be fixed.

 

yeah to be fair:

abs fixed

Maximize 120%~130%(-30%)

GS 79%

 

[JotaPe 0]

GOGO tell Wartale. But you know, +abs = -atk

 

I really like mech more tanker , but not to strong.

[L 677]

GOGO tell Wartale. But you know, +abs = -atk

 

I really like mech more tanker , but not to strong.

+1

 

yah, mech should be a TANKER char as i said on another topic, not TOO strong

[babyarcher 0]

No. Maximize should be kept as is. There is no fixed ways mechs "should" be. Mechs are supposed to be a versatile class, you can play them whatever build you want to - tank, power, auto, etc. 

 

This thread is asking for mechs to tank like their defensive stats show. Currently, mechs have highest abs/def/blk, but tank the least in bc. And that doesn't make sennse. Whether or not you choose to have over 300 abs, or have 150 abs (PA build vs maximize build) is not up for discussion, its up to the players' choice.

[Gogg 3]

As I said, trade all defense and absorption from MA/PA to use Maximize must worth something. Or else you'll make it useles again

[Zero 0]

As I said, trade all defense and absorption from MA/PA to use Maximize must worth something. Or else you'll make it useles again

 

Exactly, people do not get it through their heads a power mech is a power mech, a tank mech is a tank mech, a spark mech is a spark mech, and a auto mech is a auto mech. There is some linkage between the classes [such as how any high level mech basically becomes a hybrid in some way], but there is not enough to justify that changes on one should adversely affect the other.

 

Everyone is trying to compare apples to oranges here, a change on tank mech should not effect power mech, they are fundamentally different. Its like saying "Prs gained in defense, so we must take attack from knights to balance out the new "defense" the classes gained".

 

The skill limitations make clear separations, the opponents of this argument are not demonstrating clear thinking. Maxi and MA cannot be used at the same time, by definition they have already penalized themselves to make this gain. They have already given up 76 abs and defense for that power, you guys are asking a penalty be applied twice. This is clearly unfair, and while compulsion may be used by both, the changes would be minimal if anything that would be needed to be made on power mech. Mech is not OP to begin with, so I doubt even that would be necessary.

[Hains 0]

GOGO tell Wartale. But you know, +abs = -atk

 

I really like mech more tanker , but not to strong.

+1

 

yah, mech should be a TANKER char as i said on another topic, not TOO strong

 

+1~ no doubts

[babyarcher 0]

GOGO tell Wartale. But you know, +abs = -atk

 

I really like mech more tanker , but not to strong.

 

As I said, trade all defense and absorption from MA/PA to use Maximize must worth something. Or else you'll make it useles again

 

It's already happening when you trade the abs + def gained from MA to use maximize. There's no reason for people to call for a nerf on maximize or anything silly like that.

[Gogg 3]

I'm sure with mechs fixed the real tanker will come up again, over 4k def and over 300 abs is quite a lot

[Hains 0]

^ from what lvl?

[Gogg 3]

12x+, depending on items

[Hains 0]

hey gogg, what's ur abs / defense / atp / etc ?

[Gogg 3]

4150 def, 311 abs

 

Still a lot to grow

 

Dmg I can't say power siege on, i'm lazy to do the math

[Hains 0]

power siege

 

[ADONIS 0]

Great campaing we just want to tank...

[Mekan 0]

4150 def, 311 abs

 

Still a lot to grow

 

Dmg I can't say power siege on, i'm lazy to do the math

 

really great status Gogg but imagine now with T5 defense skills

i can say a lot of mechs 10x+ will be have a minimum of 3k def

certainly the tank ll be better(if mechs stay with shield) but its a risk weapon 2 hands with this abs bug.

cause this i said mech need be fixeed  :

[uok_vn 0]

Need fix in BC. Mech so weak....