Lets Talk About BC

[Mjizzy_7 2,077]

The reality is that its boring that every time we have the same problems. 1 Side get fked by having lower numbers while the other has more. Its just boring that we go every time throught this. Doesnt matter wich side but it would be nice if you are not dependet on alliances to win a pvp or Siege war.
Its always have been a problem. Tmr might be that the other side will dominate again and this day will come because in wartale history it was never that 1 side dominate 4ever. 

I know that my enemys are bored about the situation too because there are some who likes to pvp alot but atm we cant give more then this. As soon we go with 10-15 people the enemys call the double amount to pvp and then we have only the choice to leave
Also i can understand that friendships between this big numbers happend and they dont want fight each other but thats the price for this, having a short time of pvp. 

It is what it is

 

Edited July 30 by Mjizzy_7

[(◕﹏◕✿) 75]

9 minutes ago, Mjizzy_7 said:

The reality is that its boring that every time we have the same problems. 1 Side get fked by having lower numbers while the other has more. Its just boring that we go every time throught this. Doesnt matter wich side but it would be nice if you are not dependet on alliances to win a pvp or Siege war.
Its always have been a problem. Tmr might be that the other side will dominate again and this day will come because in wartale history it was never that 1 side dominate 4ever. 

I know that my enemys are bored about the situation too because there are some who likes to pvp alot but atm we cant give more then this. As soon we go with 10-15 people the enemys call the double amount to pvp and then we have only the choice to leave
Also i can understand that friendships between this big numbers happend and they dont want fight each other but thats the price for this, having a short time of pvp. 

It is what it is

 

 

Said the guy who always had an alliance, and when they opposed stopping, he kicked all the BRs from the clan 🥱

[Mjizzy_7 2,077]

2 minutes ago, (◕﹏◕✿) said:

 

Said the guy who always had an alliance, and when they opposed stopping, he kicked all the BRs from the clan 🥱

U bark only in this forum. Accept the true because what i say is a fact and everyone knows. Im talking about the general time. And people who know me know how much it made me mad when we dominated and the enemy didnt show up. So Psshhh and go Mining

 

Edited July 30 by Mjizzy_7

[xkintaro 2,153]

1 hour ago, neinhalt said:

You guys call ur self #Giants AND the Best clan on this server??? This Is the right Time to prove it

 

We prove every Sunday, when even outnumbered by the double of players we still go to the siege, unlike other clans that decide to go on strike and avoid the blessing for months.

 

 

[YARDBR 183]

1 hour ago, Mjizzy_7 said:

The reality is that its boring that every time we have the same problems. 1 Side get fked by having lower numbers while the other has more. Its just boring that we go every time throught this. Doesnt matter wich side but it would be nice if you are not dependet on alliances to win a pvp or Siege war.
Its always have been a problem. Tmr might be that the other side will dominate again and this day will come because in wartale history it was never that 1 side dominate 4ever. 

I know that my enemys are bored about the situation too because there are some who likes to pvp alot but atm we cant give more then this. As soon we go with 10-15 people the enemys call the double amount to pvp and then we have only the choice to leave
Also i can understand that friendships between this big numbers happend and they dont want fight each other but thats the price for this, having a short time of pvp. 

It is what it is

 

Perfect placement, people think that I try to change the alliance system to harm some group, but everyone within the alliance knows that when I played with you, I always pressured for the alliance to end, and we could equally move the server more, even if we have differences of opinion and ideas, the game needs to be moved and it is absurdly undeniable that the game would improve a lot if we could meet in an equal battle, Clan against Clan, and not alliance against clan.

 

 

Some people message me calling me a traitor, have I ever lied that I'm against alliances? And I've always made it extremely clear that one day there would be a Clan that would change that.

 

 

Yesterday we had a really cool start to the fight in MD, we were 11 against 16, but it was being cool, in less than 10 minutes it became 13 against 41, does anyone think it's possible to play like this? You want to purge everyone from the server and be the biggest, but then who are you going to play against?

 

I'm not being a victim or trying to say anything like that, I'm saying that in the game everything depends on proportion, and today it's very disproportionate, I know that in the past other big alliances existed, but you can talk to people from SN, I was one of the first to start fighting this, until we won and ended the MIB, but unfortunately the side I supported now is the alliance that is bad for the game.

[shakil 21]

I don't know how long you've been playing Priston, but that's how it is.

There will NEVER be a "third side" in the game, and I'm talking about Priston itself, not just Wartale.

Another thing, removing names from SW will definitely hurt the MIB side more. Just look at SW; they're already completely lost; they seem like they don't know how to play, communicate, or move.

If we remove names, it will be much worse for them, since many on our side are already used to this kind of blessing and know how to communicate in these situations. So, the same thing would continue, and we would still be able to make MIB not even have a crown. Since they're pretty bad and pathetic.

[Davkey~ 0]

15 hours ago, YARDBR said:

I am not in favor of any alliance and I have always made that clear...

 

 

It may seem like we have an alliance with MIB, but we don't.

 

 

If 30 people from SN are attacking me, and 1 from MIB is passing by and I don't attack MIB, am I his ally?

 

 

La Tribu is so weak that you don't even consider them part of the alliance? As I said before, they are just puppets.

What resentment, envy and hatred I see in your little skirt.
Li'l trash 😛

[-Vodka- 703]

57 minutes ago, YARDBR said:

Perfect placement, people think that I try to change the alliance system to harm some group, but everyone within the alliance knows that when I played with you, I always pressured for the alliance to end, and we could equally move the server more, even if we have differences of opinion and ideas, the game needs to be moved and it is absurdly undeniable that the game would improve a lot if we could meet in an equal battle, Clan against Clan, and not alliance against clan.

 

 

Some people message me calling me a traitor, have I ever lied that I'm against alliances? And I've always made it extremely clear that one day there would be a Clan that would change that.

 

 

Yesterday we had a really cool start to the fight in MD, we were 11 against 16, but it was being cool, in less than 10 minutes it became 13 against 41, does anyone think it's possible to play like this? You want to purge everyone from the server and be the biggest, but then who are you going to play against?

 

I'm not being a victim or trying to say anything like that, I'm saying that in the game everything depends on proportion, and today it's very disproportionate, I know that in the past other big alliances existed, but you can talk to people from SN, I was one of the first to start fighting this, until we won and ended the MIB, but unfortunately the side I supported now is the alliance that is bad for the game.

 

What’s your nickname in the game ? Since you have so many suggestions for the server, you probably already  have a character right ?

[YARDBR 183]

58 minutes ago, shakil said:

I don't know how long you've been playing Priston, but that's how it is.

There will NEVER be a "third side" in the game, and I'm talking about Priston itself, not just Wartale.

Another thing, removing names from SW will definitely hurt the MIB side more. Just look at SW; they're already completely lost; they seem like they don't know how to play, communicate, or move.

If we remove names, it will be much worse for them, since many on our side are already used to this kind of blessing and know how to communicate in these situations. So, the same thing would continue, and we would still be able to make MIB not even have a crown. Since they're pretty bad and pathetic.

the idea of taking names is only from enemies, and not from your clan

14 minutes ago, -Vodka- said:

 

What’s your nickname in the game ? Since you have so many suggestions for the server, you probably already  have a character right ?

[E+] XengaBlenga 

 

??????

 

See my fórum profile first Bro

 

 

[YougNX 102]

borrowed account, F GEKO

[ik3r 973]

Alliance and things like the exists since server was started xD.

 

Sometimes is 60x180, other times 120x180, 120x120,150x60.... is a circle, the current system is design for this., if you want a SW without any ally you need remake it.

 

Maybe if we have a system where you can buff golden crown when you defend the castle can change something.

 

Example:

   you take golden crown you got a 10%dmg boost;

   if you defend the castle, increase the buf to 13%;

   if you defend again increase to 15%....

 

 

 

[neinhalt 61]

1 hour ago, YARDBR said:

Perfect placement, people think that I try to change the alliance system to harm some group, but everyone within the alliance knows that when I played with you, I always pressured for the alliance to end, and we could equally move the server more, even if we have differences of opinion and ideas, the game needs to be moved and it is absurdly undeniable that the game would improve a lot if we could meet in an equal battle, Clan against Clan, and not alliance against clan.

 

 

Some people message me calling me a traitor, have I ever lied that I'm against alliances? And I've always made it extremely clear that one day there would be a Clan that would change that.

 

 

Yesterday we had a really cool start to the fight in MD, we were 11 against 16, but it was being cool, in less than 10 minutes it became 13 against 41, does anyone think it's possible to play like this? You want to purge everyone from the server and be the biggest, but then who are you going to play against?

 

I'm not being a victim or trying to say anything like that, I'm saying that in the game everything depends on proportion, and today it's very disproportionate, I know that in the past other big alliances existed, but you can talk to people from SN, I was one of the first to start fighting this, until we won and ended the MIB, but unfortunately the side I supported now is the alliance that is bad for the game.

Dude how do I put this; I saw 4-5 players from ur clan atacking 1 single player from Latribu (elo**** Ps) 1 months ago and you or your ppl were hunting him cse he was the only1 with pvp on and thats was ok right?? But now u were outnumbered AND you call It not a fair fight, I really want to help u guys but how???

Edited July 30 by neinhalt

[-Vodka- 703]

1 minute ago, YougNX said:

borrowed account, F GEKO

I have the pw of a 17x char, can i say it’s mine ? Hahahahahaha

[YARDBR 183]

1 minute ago, ik3r said:

Alliance and things like the exists since server was started xD.

 

Sometimes is 60x180, other times 120x180, 120x120,150x60.... is a circle, the current system is design for this., if you want a SW without any ally you need remake it.

 

Maybe if we have a system where you can buff golden crown when you defend the castle can change something.

 

Example:

   you take golden crown you got a 10%dmg boost;

   if you defend the castle, increase the buf to 13%;

   if you defend again increase to 15%....

 

 

 

Dude, I agree it's been around for a long time, but wouldn't now be a good time to end it so we can change the reality of the game? We all like competition, I always see you in BC, we all like to fight and have fun there

[Muka 55]

23 hours ago, YARDBR said:

With the game suffering from failed alliances and players completely unable to gain anything with their own effort, the server suffers.

 

After talking to several players, we feel that the BC has become obsolete, and a large part of the problem of the game's content productivity decline may come from the BC's lack of competitiveness.

 

Some weak and failed clans cannot win without having allies, 1 clan fighting against an alliance of 5 clans, for example, is one of the scenarios that the game has today.

 

The ideal idea would be a Bless Castle where it would not be possible to see the name and clan of the enemies, this would force the end of the alliances, and everyone would fight for the crown with their own recruited players.

 

Losers who need alliances wouldn't be able to sell consistently, the game would be more competitive and this alliance system that ends competition would end, so the game would take on a new gameplay structure, where everyone has a chance to win...

 

 

The idea is launched

 

 

 

 

 

The topic originally started as a complaint about in-game alliances due to the "Bless Castle" dispute. Now, after a chain of replies, it has somehow shifted into complaints about alliances during mid-week PvP fights. In short, this entire thread has led nowhere.

Even if the Sunday "Bless Castle" event were changed so that players couldn’t see clan names—or even character names—it would solve absolutely nothing. There’s communication inside and outside the game, remember? So we’re already off to a brilliant start with that suggestion.

And what about the rest of the week? What exactly would change? Right—nothing at all. People will keep getting stomped and will just have to deal with it. Please, my friend, if you’re going to make a suggestion, try to have at least some idea of what you're talking about. Don’t just throw words into the wind—it only makes you look worse.

Thanks!
You're welcome.
LERDÃO!

[drfencer 60]

3 vs 3 clans and crying? I don't understand. The problem is about leaders....