Jump to content
DarkLink64

What happened, BoosterHooD? 3rd Strike

When BoosterHooD will disband?  

25 members have voted

You do not have permission to vote in this poll, or see the poll results. Please sign in or register to vote in this poll.

Recommended Posts

DarkLink64

Now for the 4th Week in a Row. What happened to the all mighty clan that managed to get a high score, overtook CL, maintained a good lead and LOST AT THE VERY ENDING OF SIEGE WAR?

 

Oh, maybe it was because the "all mighty" army of Archers got roflstomped all the time, dying very easy, due to the removal of BoosterHooD precious boost reward, 10% evasion?
TpxvvPE.png
And oh, what is that? BoosterHooD had to CHEAT again to try to scope a win? Climbing into Valhalla Tower, so these fellow Boosters wouldn't get killed by PvP and just score free points?

And even still you managed to lose at the very decisive moment? Oh no nono. I have to stop. I can foresaw: "3 clan vs 1" garbage already. Stop with that stupidity. BoosterHooD is composed by RMT experts from SoNois, the laggy and inexperienced ConQuerOrs , and with the good old Draxos Looters from Legiao (hi MvBooster, former pike of Legiao that was very famous for stealing other people loot from Draxos without damaging it).


HOJE NÃO, HOJE NÃO, HOJE NÃAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAO!!!!.... Hoje sim... HOJE SIM!!!
 

Resultado de imagem para mario laughing

Resultado de imagem para rosalina sad

Resultado de imagem para rosalina sad

Resultado de imagem para rosalina sadResultado de imagem para peach and daisy laughing

Resultado de imagem para princess peach crying

Resultado de imagem para princess peach crying

 

 

 

It was fun while it lasted! But fareweel, you won't be missed. Kisses, happy boosting... Oh, sorry. Happy staring at the sky of Ricarten.

Let's not forget what caused BoosterHooD own failure:

Spoiler

 

 

 

 

 

 

aVo3wEv.jpg


 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bieelliima1

3 clans almost lose for 1 clan, u can say whatever u want dl. u guys need to have 3 to handle 1. if you dont think thats true, lets try 1 vs 1 in sw, u will see whos gonna win. 

i mean, u know its true thats why cl need lb and pm. I remmember when cl couldnt  even fight in sw. stop being so pathetic.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Marvel
6 minutes ago, bieelliima1 said:

3 clãs quase perdem por 1 clã, vc pode dizer o que vc quiser dl. Vocês precisam ter 3 para lidar com 1. Se você não acha que isso é verdade, vamos tentar 1 vs 1 em sw, vc vai ver quem vai ganhar. 

Quero dizer, você sabe que é verdade, por que cl precisa de lb e pm. Eu me lembro quando o cl não podia nem lutar no sw. Pare de ser tão patético.

 

 

Each one reaps what he plants, the same story (3) clan, as said the JOTINHA 3 clans and can not stand now that things change always has apologies ...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
haiser
2 hours ago, bieelliima1 said:

3 clans almost lose for 1 clan, u can say whatever u want dl. u guys need to have 3 to handle 1. if you dont think thats true, lets try 1 vs 1 in sw, u will see whos gonna win. 

i mean, u know its true thats why cl need lb and pm. I remmember when cl couldnt  even fight in sw. stop being so pathetic.

BH = Sonois, EnemieZ and ConQ

7 top lvl,(n00b have items edit(all ppl know that)

so.. why u cry?

GM no help u in SOD?ohhh Sorry, Rod left ? so sad BoosterHood

  • Like 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DarkLink64
8 hours ago, bieelliima1 said:

3 clans almost lose for 1 clan, u can say whatever u want dl. u guys need to have 3 to handle 1. if you dont think thats true, lets try 1 vs 1 in sw, u will see whos gonna win. 

i mean, u know its true thats why cl need lb and pm. I remmember when cl couldnt  even fight in sw. stop being so pathetic.

 

Hehehe, I've foresaw this ludicrous "3 clan vs 1 clan" bullcrap.

You can always disband / leave from BH and change nickname if that is bothering you, but the fact remains: BH is a looser without Boosting Evasion.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
bieelliima1

Just accept the truth, if lb fight for themself also cl fight for themself they could never win thats why now they play together. 

Edited by bieelliima1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DarkLink64
5 hours ago, bieelliima1 said:

Just accept the truth, if lb fight for themself also cl fight for themself they could never win thats why now they play together. 

The only truth here is that you lost at the very last moments.
This is what matters.
1292123500755.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
xunahyo

LOL. Very nice. I'm excited for the next BrotherHood Strike. Keep it up!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DarkLink64
1 hour ago, xunahyo said:

LOL. Very nice. I'm excited for the next BrotherHood Strike. Keep it up!

What is a "BrotherHood"? I only know BoosterHooD.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GAVIAO.

how could... Maybe 10 players with evasion buff (in a clan with 60 players) could make such a  difference against 3 clans in bc ? LOL 

BH really won all blesses(before remove evasion buff) because 10 players had evasion buff ? And they are losing now because there is no evasion buff ?  And About they are 60 against 130 players ? This make no difference ?
I'm trying to understand that.

  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DarkLink64
9 hours ago, matadro2 said:

how could... Maybe 10 players with evasion buff (in a clan with 60 players) could make such a  difference against 3 clans in bc ? LOL 

BH really won all blesses(before remove evasion buff) because 10 players had evasion buff ? And they are losing now because there is no evasion buff ?  And About they are 60 against 130 players ? This make no difference ?
I'm trying to understand that.

BH won back then for many factors:

1- HP of tower/door was too high, adjusted for when Knight had massive damage on Lightning Sword. That's why BH managed to defend so easily.
2- They didn't have a full fleshed enemy clan. Right now many old players from PM/CL came back to game, so there is an equal power in a sense.
3- BH "strong" point is just abusing of ranger class, namely Archers and Shamans. Coupled with lots of evasion , Archer was very unlikely to die, same goes for Shaman, that has huge damage output in AoE.

4- BH main strategy is still around lag. Everyone knows that, when under lag, you receive penalties that decrease your damage at PvP by a huge factor. However this damage remains intact (100%) against doors and towers, because they're considered as PvE, not PvP. So BH always exploited this, with many of their "Archers and Shamans", namely n00b and cia, abused this and made intentional lag to the point that the pvp damage against them was discarded (server lost track of the damage calculation due to massive latency), but still managed to kill structures. 


Also, don't be fool. The staff mentioned that almost 110 players had "stockpilled" evasion buffs - Players that got the champion and just stopped to play, and went back to SW only.

Everyone also knows that BoosterHooD clan is made by BPT players, who, during the week is playing on BPT to make RMT (sell itens and exp for real money) and just log into Wartale at Siege Wars.

It's highly ridiculous for you to claim that only "10" players would have the boosting reward that BH loved.

Also, due to the new system of 3 crowns rewards, it motivated many players of CL (that is 90% focused on PvE), it made old players from PM to return to play, plus, it also motivated LB to go back at full power on BC again. Coupled with the removal of Evasion, that was extremely broken on those abusing archers, this is the reality. Also there were some fixes in regard of lag abusing.


But yeah, you can keep making excuses for your own failure. Instead of babbling about 3v1 or "just" 10 players had evasion, you better start to call these RMTers that quit WT to go back to BPT to start playing here again, otherwise BarbieHooD will disband eventually.

Also - nothing is holding these old Conquerors members on your clan besides crown. It's a matter of fact that as soon as BH start to loose Sod too at more consistent rate, they won't keep on a clan that doesn't have boosting neither crowns.

 

1292123500755.png

 

Face the reality, ma'boy.

 

Edited by DarkLink64

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
GAVIAO.

I'm not BH member lol my point of view is just from someone who see the things as a ''normal player'', who never  go bc, but with your explanation i had an better undestanting how things works 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DarkLink64
16 minutes ago, matadro2 said:

I'm not BH member lol my point of view is just from someone who see the things as a ''normal player'', who never  go bc, but with your explanation i had an better undestanting how things works 

Ah sorry, Thought you were one of them. But yeah, this explain exactly what happened.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
christopher
3 hours ago, DarkLink64 said:

BH won back then for many factors:

1- HP of tower/door was too high, adjusted for when Knight had massive damage on Lightning Sword. That's why BH managed to defend so easily.
2- They didn't have a full fleshed enemy clan. Right now many old players from PM/CL came back to game, so there is an equal power in a sense.
3- BH "strong" point is just abusing of ranger class, namely Archers and Shamans. Coupled with lots of evasion , Archer was very unlikely to die, same goes for Shaman, that has huge damage output in AoE.

4- BH main strategy is still around lag. Everyone knows that, when under lag, you receive penalties that decrease your damage at PvP by a huge factor. However this damage remains intact (100%) against doors and towers, because they're considered as PvE, not PvP. So BH always exploited this, with many of their "Archers and Shamans", namely n00b and cia, abused this and made intentional lag to the point that the pvp damage against them was discarded (server lost track of the damage calculation due to massive latency), but still managed to kill structures. 


Also, don't be fool. The staff mentioned that almost 110 players had "stockpilled" evasion buffs - Players that got the champion and just stopped to play, and went back to SW only.

Everyone also knows that BoosterHooD clan is made by BPT players, who, during the week is playing on BPT to make RMT (sell itens and exp for real money) and just log into Wartale at Siege Wars.

It's highly ridiculous for you to claim that only "10" players would have the boosting reward that BH loved.

Also, due to the new system of 3 crowns rewards, it motivated many players of CL (that is 90% focused on PvE), it made old players from PM to return to play, plus, it also motivated LB to go back at full power on BC again. Coupled with the removal of Evasion, that was extremely broken on those abusing archers, this is the reality. Also there were some fixes in regard of lag abusing.


But yeah, you can keep making excuses for your own failure. Instead of babbling about 3v1 or "just" 10 players had evasion, you better start to call these RMTers that quit WT to go back to BPT to start playing here again, otherwise BarbieHooD will disband eventually.

Also - nothing is holding these old Conquerors members on your clan besides crown. It's a matter of fact that as soon as BH start to loose Sod too at more consistent rate, they won't keep on a clan that doesn't have boosting neither crowns.

 

1292123500755.png

 

Face the reality, ma'boy.

 

Shit,  i can said the same thing with you.

1.) DEFENSE WAS TOO HIGH? Then how come ? BH can take the crown back easy. ( only need ~ 30 minutes for BH to win SW.)

2.) BH now does not have full clan, a lot of people like myself are on vacation so i do not play game a lot. and fyi, if the other clan doesnt have full members if you are working together you still can win the SW because all the point will divide to all clan and whoever has the highest point win the SW. So, if LB, PM, CL are work together and DID NOT GIVE UP then you can still destroyed the vahalla and whoever has the highest point win the SW. Its has happen sometimes during the HP was too high, but most of the time LB/CL usually gave up half way.

3.) Ranger class are free of access in this server, if you said that why dont you and your friends change to ranger class. POINT NOT VALID!   FYI, Archer has the most death during SW in any char, but on the other hand they has the highest kills also.

4.) As for everybody know LAG has happen to EVERYBODY during SW. POINT NOT VALID AGAIN! and CL has the MOST LAGGED MEMBERS especially Vietnamese players because of their poor connection/internet.

About the evasion buffs, it has some effect on the SW but not much because both side can have access to it. PM,CL,LB may have a higher chance to win champions buffs if they are joining more.

 

 The 3 crowns system are working heavily in favor of PM/CL./LB side and thats THE REASON THAT BH COULDNT TAKE THE CROWN BECAUSE CL/PM/LB has too many players with crowns and they HAS x3 or x4 more  overall power than BH.

 

You are just delusional and you are always look at the game on your point of view but your point of view are not always correct.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
christopher

Also, i would like to add. With the new 3 crowns system. Its work the very similar way and has the similar effect with " LEAVING CLAN AND JOIN THE DIFFERENT CLAN TO TAKE THE CROWN." because with the same members they can take the GOLD CROWN the first week then take the SILVER CROWN the next week and then retake the GOLD CROWN the third week and keep going. But, it is only work if you has a lot of member ( more than 100 members.)

 

For example, i will use BH vs PM and LB. ( i didnt include CL because they didnt got the crowns, BUT do not forget they are still participate in the alliance and helping PM,LB take the crown.)

The reason BH couldnt win the SW in multiple weeks in a role is because PM and LB are in the same alliance. So when BH try to take the crown with PM and compete with LB. PM has the gold crown so their job is killing all the BH's members ( which is heavily effect on how BH can take the crown.) On the other hand, LB has no enemies so they has all the free time to take down the tower and has better score overall. The second point is, LB with silver/bronze crowns. ( which increase their atk damage.) so now they has the damage to compete with BH, because LB has more members in their alliance.

Then the next week, they just rotate the position between their alliance and switch the crown among the alliance. For example, LB will have the gold crown, then their job is to kill as much as BH as they can so PM has a higher chance to win. and they are keep repeating the process.

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DarkLink64
20 minutes ago, christopher said:

Shit,  i can said the same thing with you.

1.) DEFENSE WAS TOO HIGH? Then how come ? BH can take the crown back easy. ( only need ~ 30 minutes for BH to win SW.)

2.) BH now does not have full clan, a lot of people like myself are on vacation so i do not play game a lot. and fyi, if the other clan doesnt have full members if you are working together you still can win the SW because all the point will divide to all clan and whoever has the highest point win the SW. So, if LB, PM, CL are work together and DID NOT GIVE UP then you can still destroyed the vahalla and whoever has the highest point win the SW. Its has happen sometimes during the HP was too high, but most of the time LB/CL usually gave up half way.

3.) Ranger class are free of access in this server, if you said that why dont you and your friends change to ranger class. POINT NOT VALID!   FYI, Archer has the most death during SW in any char, but on the other hand they has the highest kills also.

4.) As for everybody know LAG has happen to EVERYBODY during SW. POINT NOT VALID AGAIN! and CL has the MOST LAGGED MEMBERS especially Vietnamese players because of their poor connection/internet.

About the evasion buffs, it has some effect on the SW but not much because both side can have access to it. PM,CL,LB may have a higher chance to win champions buffs if they are joining more.

 

 The 3 crowns system are working heavily in favor of PM/CL./LB side and thats THE REASON THAT BH COULDNT TAKE THE CROWN BECAUSE CL/PM/LB has too many players with crowns and they HAS x3 or x4 more  overall power than BH.

 

You are just delusional and you are always look at the game on your point of view but your point of view are not always correct.

Are you high? Can't read?
 

1) I didn't talked about taking over, I was talking about DEFENSE - not attacking.

2) Nobody cares if you don't have full clan. Come on, more excuses? I can tell you that PM/CL/LB/whatever didn't have full clan before. So, bla bla bla.

3) Yeah, it's free to access. Calm down, dude. I was just telling what made BH strong, chill out. 

4)No no no no. We have more than enough proof that n00b and cia always lags like crap, much more than everyone else. Lag in SW is expected, but nothing compares to these archers/ss from BoosterHooD. This is common knowledge. Also it's very easy to make proposital lag, like using net limiters, downloading/uploading torrents. Many of your "foreign" archer and shaman players abused this all SW.

 

3 Crowns system was made with only one goal: Promote more clans to Siege War. And it worked wonderfully. If BH have 3 enemy clan, that's your problem. Usually it's just you "colhendo o que plantou", this is what you guys always wanted. When LB was a small clan, BH badmouted and trashtalked a lot to LB.

Now it's wonderfull to see BH desperately and sourceless to the point of crying out loud about "3 clan vs 1". Deal with it.

 

I am not delusional, I was straight to the point.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DarkLink64
34 minutes ago, christopher said:

Also, i would like to add. With the new 3 crowns system. Its work the very similar way and has the similar effect with " LEAVING CLAN AND JOIN THE DIFFERENT CLAN TO TAKE THE CROWN." because with the same members they can take the GOLD CROWN the first week then take the SILVER CROWN the next week and then retake the GOLD CROWN the third week and keep going. But, it is only work if you has a lot of member ( more than 100 members.)

 

For example, i will use BH vs PM and LB. ( i didnt include CL because they didnt got the crowns, BUT do not forget they are still participate in the alliance and helping PM,LB take the crown.)

The reason BH couldnt win the SW in multiple weeks in a role is because PM and LB are in the same alliance. So when BH try to take the crown with PM and compete with LB. PM has the gold crown so their job is killing all the BH's members ( which is heavily effect on how BH can take the crown.) On the other hand, LB has no enemies so they has all the free time to take down the tower and has better score overall. The second point is, LB with silver/bronze crowns. ( which increase their atk damage.) so now they has the damage to compete with BH, because LB has more members in their alliance.

Then the next week, they just rotate the position between their alliance and switch the crown among the alliance. For example, LB will have the gold crown, then their job is to kill as much as BH as they can so PM has a higher chance to win. and they are keep repeating the process.

 

 

IT's against the rules to switch an entire clan to a different one before Siege War.

Also, it can't help but think it wouldn't work for BH. Even switching to a different clan, you can't deal with us.

Don't blame the 3 crown system. It is working wonderfully well and we're having top quality Siege Wars since it was implemented, fullfilling it's goal to bring more players and clans to Siege War.

If your clan has 3 enemies, perhaps the problem is with your clan, not with the game or with us.


And what about alliance? Is there a problem with it? BoosterhooD has alliance with minor and small clans like HappyBoost, KingOfBoost, Caution, Conquerors, Legiao, etc. If your alliances are not enough stacked against ours, again, it's a problem of yours, not a problem of the game.

Also, stop with this bullcrap already. Your guys are talking like 3 clans vs 1 sounds like a 180 man vs 60.

PM barely has 30 active players, and on Siege War, we can't put more than 20 players online. This is a issue, and that's why we're not on CL. We are trying to build our own philosophy and our own clan, and it takes time. But if we are allied with LB and CL, it's something related to us and you can't do anything about it.

Also, let's suppose it was really 180 players vs 60. Don't forget that we are limited in our strategies, since we can't fully use AoE skills so we would kill ourselves. We are limited only on 1v1 killing, that is proven many times that is way inferior to AoE at Siege War.

I was not delusional, I just pinpointed the obvious: Archer and Shaman was the key power on Siege War because they tank a lot due to abusive evasion stacking, and outputs a insane aumont of AoE.

This is something we can't fully take advantage off, so, the removal of evasion from boosting is a consequence of BoosterHooD own boosting. Now if your precious laggy Archers/Shamans can't survive like before, all you can do is 

Deal with it.

Edited by DarkLink64
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jayro
1 hour ago, christopher said:

 On the other hand, LB has no enemies so they has all the free time to take down the tower and has better score overall.

Disagree. LB's are being killed by DirtyPigeons. Right @Enigma

Edited by jayro

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lhyamauti
6 hours ago, jayro said:

Disagree. LB's are being killed by DirtyPigeons. Right @Enigma

Yes, and Caution and Kingofmoon too.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

News and Updates

×
×
  • Create New...