spelar 1 Report post Posted September 24, 2019 Hi very few do ct3 q. Why not make solo q for lvl up from 120- 132? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Nooodle 16 Report post Posted September 24, 2019 There is the daily quest in AD. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
spelar 1 Report post Posted September 25, 2019 Yes i know i got 5% from it hahah Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mcslug2 211 Report post Posted September 25, 2019 Ppl always want the easiest way to lvl ct3q was 1 hour beforw and we lvled that way even with lower equips now aging up.lvl after 3 agings and now u can make even the double xp.then beforw since ct3q can be made every 30 min also they added 400 mobs now doing 48bi each quest what more do you want? Chars start at lvl 144? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
NeoHiei 514 Report post Posted September 25, 2019 (edited) 1 hour ago, mcslug2 said: Ppl always want the easiest way to lvl ct3q was 1 hour beforw and we lvled that way even with lower equips now aging up.lvl after 3 agings and now u can make even the double xp.then beforw since ct3q can be made every 30 min also they added 400 mobs now doing 48bi each quest what more do you want? Chars start at lvl 144? I think the problem isn't to make ct3q easier, the problem is the fact ct3q is dead and buried 7feet under the ground (DiQ too). Low level players should have the option to gain exp the same way we do in SS, where we don't depend on finding a lurer, a tank.. just make a group and every class can kill your own monster. 120~143 is demotivating for players. Both ct3q and diq playstyles are ridiculous from scratch because you don't have another option if you're a fighter, pikeman, knight etc.. (well, you can go ad1, 2 or 3, but it is also stupid since you depend on a magic class to gain exp). Some changes could attract new players to the server for sure. Edit: the point isn't make anything easier, the point is to adapt and change things that doesn't work anymore. 120-143 is completely unbalanced when compared to 144+ And just because we did it the hard way a long time ago it doesn't mean it has to stay this way, improvements are always welcomed. Just think of it, if we follow your logic it means that when scientists discover the cure for cancer it wouldn't be fair to use it because millions of people had to take chemotherapy before the cure. Also smartphones wouldn't be fair to people from the 1900's that sent letters to each other. Evolution is needed in everything. Things can't be the same forever, everything needs improvement from time to time. Edited September 25, 2019 by NeoHiei 1 2 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites