YARDBR 163 Report post Posted July 29 With the game suffering from failed alliances and players completely unable to gain anything with their own effort, the server suffers. After talking to several players, we feel that the BC has become obsolete, and a large part of the problem of the game's content productivity decline may come from the BC's lack of competitiveness. Some weak and failed clans cannot win without having allies, 1 clan fighting against an alliance of 5 clans, for example, is one of the scenarios that the game has today. The ideal idea would be a Bless Castle where it would not be possible to see the name and clan of the enemies, this would force the end of the alliances, and everyone would fight for the crown with their own recruited players. Losers who need alliances wouldn't be able to sell consistently, the game would be more competitive and this alliance system that ends competition would end, so the game would take on a new gameplay structure, where everyone has a chance to win... The idea is launched 13 1 10 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Capybara 558 Report post Posted July 29 You've been wanting to talk a lot lately I think you need to find yourself a companion. 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xkintaro 2,147 Report post Posted July 29 https://wartale.com/forums/topic/139409-the-problem-with-bc-and-huge-alliances https://wartale.com/forums/topic/142224-bc-map-changes-to-have-more-fun/?tab=comments#comment-757952 many and many suggestions on this topic already, and being ignored for a long time too with no answers. the community has been asking for changes since 2022, and nothing has changed 1 6 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YARDBR 163 Report post Posted July 29 13 minutes ago, xkintaro said: https://wartale.com/forums/topic/139409-the-problem-with-bc-and-huge-alliances https://wartale.com/forums/topic/142224-bc-map-changes-to-have-more-fun/?tab=comments#comment-757952 many and many suggestions on this topic already, and being ignored for a long time too with no answers. the community has been asking for changes since 2022, and nothing has changed We need to show the staff what we prefer in the game or we will lose all chances of improving what comes next. Old threads won't solve our problems, we need to talk to the Staff now about what we want. BC is a total piece of crap and unplayable and no fun. Weak alliances should be criminalized in the game, the game is meant to be played, not arranged. These big losers are arguing on discord about who will take the crown and the game is in this deplorable situation without any gameplay. This is just an opinion from someone who trusts Sandur and loves his game. BC needs to change and the alliances have to end or the game will end. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YougNX 93 Report post Posted July 29 What ur nickname and your level? @YARDBR 1 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
harold 47 Report post Posted July 29 16 hours ago, xkintaro said: https://wartale.com/forums/topic/139409-the-problem-with-bc-and-huge-alliances https://wartale.com/forums/topic/142224-bc-map-changes-to-have-more-fun/?tab=comments#comment-757952 many and many suggestions on this topic already, and being ignored for a long time too with no answers. the community has been asking for changes since 2022, and nothing has changed that is what on my mind kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk too much nonsense suggestions than fix main problem like LAG and MACRO Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pique 38 Report post Posted July 29 -1 cause small clan will suffer in the gamer for siege war. example la tribu :s if no have alliance they can only dream of a crown. Clan like Mafia, Sonois Escrotos and Losborrachos will fight for place 2-3 and MadeinBraza will dominate the Siege war because they have the most experience player for Siege war ^,^" maybe make the Map of Bless castle bigger for use more strategy and change the HP of Tower? 1 5 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YARDBR 163 Report post Posted July 29 10 minutes ago, Pique said: -1 cause small clan will suffer in the gamer for siege war. example la tribu :s if no have alliance they can only dream of a crown. Clan like Mafia, Sonois Escrotos and Losborrachos will fight for place 2-3 and MadeinBraza will dominate the Siege war because they have the most experience player for Siege war ^,^" maybe make the Map of Bless castle bigger for use more strategy and change the HP of Tower? The name of this is merit. The game is made for the best to win and not for losers. If you want to win, learn and improve. Lá tribu are just losers being carried Does this system harm those who are better and more organized If you want to win, get organized, study and improve, and you will win. Not with pathetic alliances where someone will tell you what you might not do. la tribu are just a bunch of pathetic losers who accepted crumbs. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
kenibok 1,097 Report post Posted July 29 I think the main problem for BC and game competitiveness overall is the huge imbalance between classes (PvP and PvE) and the expensive it is to be competitive on bc 40kc draxos 20-30kc each relic, etc This alliance scenario has happened many times to the side with less alliances, a cicle, and BC kept having daily wars and participation but today this is d.e.a.d 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
shakil 18 Report post Posted July 29 You know that not having a name wouldn't change anything at all, right? It would hurt the bad guys in the MIB more than it does today, since even seeing their names makes them look like dizzy ****roaches walking around the BC. xd If they can't have direction without seeing their own allies, imagine without? They might not even be able to get a third place. The way they are bad Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
mastellini 542 Report post Posted July 29 (edited) Siege War is an outdated system. There should be clan-versus-clan competition (1v1) and other pvp alternatives throughout the week. I hope the next patch brings improvements to Battlegrounds. Edited July 29 by mastellini 4 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
frozza 48 Report post Posted July 29 Hiding the nicks would also block the communication system, right? The alliance would no longer be able to communicate and say where they are so as not to attack each other.. One suggestion more pathetic than the other. 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Li0nKingJr 45 Report post Posted July 29 It didn't take long for the mask to fall... what a disappointment 1 1 1 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xkintaro 2,147 Report post Posted July 29 19 minutes ago, mastellini said: Siege War is an outdated system. There should be clan-versus-clan competition (1v1) and other pvp alternatives throughout the week. I hope the next patch brings improvements to Battlegrounds. already suggested something like this, with factions, but on side only can go with the same number as the other faction, if a big amount of players want to join one faction, like 200 players in one side against other with 80 players, they only would be able to join 80 x 80 (120 in queue), this would be the most balanced way possible, would still require supervision against sabotage from both sides. each player would define their faction and it would cost something around 500kk, with a delay of 1 week to change faction for example. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lordbowie 33 Report post Posted July 29 44 minutes ago, Li0nKingJr said: It didn't take long for the mask to fall... what a disappointment Just because we dont agree with that patetic Aliance? +1 for Topic Aeros 17x Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
slinshadow 2 Report post Posted July 29 I think forcing players to spawn outside the castle after death, would bring some nice dynamics to the battle, more strategy, more coop-play inside the clans, and even more balance between the SW... Nowadays situation is that the clan with more damage wins the battle, even if they dont have a nice strategy! Alliances were decisive part of all the dynamics between medieval lords and reigns, and as wartale is a game with that thematic, I dont see any problem in having them in the game.. but as i saw in many other topics in the wartale forum, why not start to bring new dynamic solutions instead of cutting off things already exists? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Li0nKingJr 45 Report post Posted July 29 (edited) If that were all... Edited July 30 by Support Quote in other language got removed Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
(◕﹏◕✿) 75 Report post Posted July 29 3 minutes ago, lordbowie said: Just because we dont agree with that patetic Aliance? +1 for Topic Aeros 17x Ironically, the member who uses other players the most and tries at all costs to form alliances to get the crown is in your clan bro Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
lordbowie 33 Report post Posted July 29 30 minutes ago, (◕﹏◕✿) said: Ironically, the member who uses other players the most and tries at all costs to form alliances to get the crown is in your clan bro Thats Not true. In our clan, the decision-maker is our leader, not the members. This is a basic rule. NO ALLIES 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
YougNX 93 Report post Posted July 29 MIB + KARMA + RUNA + LB = OK ✅✅✅✅✅ KARMA + EX SN (TRAITORS) + TITO LINDO = OK ✅✅✅✅✅ MAFIA + SN = NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 6 4 3 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Merenda 892 Report post Posted July 29 (edited) 5 minutes ago, YougNX said: MIB + KARMA + RUNA + LB = OK ✅✅✅✅✅ KARMA + EX SN (TRAITORS) + TITO LINDO = OK ✅✅✅✅✅ MAFIA + SN = NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭 Dude, I literally love to study this kind of people. Trying to understand their brains is so fascinating... Edited July 29 by Merenda 2 1 9 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Muzamba 61 Report post Posted July 29 +1 BALACAOOO , **** u ALLY 1 3 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rshox 69 Report post Posted July 29 +1 BALAK, *** ally 1 3 1 Share this post Link to post Share on other sites